Assessment of Knowledge and Practices of Operation Theatre Professionals Regarding Infection Control Protocols at PINS Hospital n Lahore.

The Operating Room Global Journal · Volume 1 · Issue 1
Research Article

Assessment of Knowledge and Practices of Operation Theatre Professionals Regarding Infection Control Protocols at PINS Hospital in Lahore

Authors

Abdul Wajid1*; Hafiza Tuba Razzaq2; Naeem Ashraf3; Abbas Ahmad4; Muhammad Wajid Munir5

1 Punjab Institute of Neurosciences Lahore, Pakistan.

2 Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

3 Shalamar Medical and Dental College Lahore, Pakistan.

4 Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.

5 Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology Wazirabad, Pakistan.

Corresponding Author Abdul Wajid

Abstract

Study background, objective, methodology, key findings and conclusion.

Background

Infections are the main reason for the high rates of patient mortality and morbidity in developing nations like Pakistan. Operating Theatres (OTs) are the main hospital areas where strict adherence to infection control protocols is required. Standard precautions, which are based on good practices, adequate knowledge, and healthy self-care practices, can lessen the impact of illnesses.

Objective

To assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of OT professionals regarding infection control protocols.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in PINS Hospital, Lahore. Ethical approval from the institutional review board committee was obtained. A well-structured questionnaire was used to gather data. A total of 104 healthcare professionals, including OT technologists, nurses, anaesthesiologists, surgeons, house officers, OT managers and sweepers, were chosen using a simple random sampling technique. Statistical association between variables was examined using the chi-square test. Data interpretation was conducted using SPSS version 27.

Results

Knowledge, attitude and practice among 104 healthcare workers were assessed. Of the 104 participants, 5, 89 and 10 demonstrated high, moderate and low awareness of infection control protocols, respectively. Regarding practice, 45 healthcare workers demonstrated a moderate practice rate, 10 demonstrated a high practice rate, and 49 demonstrated a poor practice rate.

Conclusion

According to the study findings, staff nurses and sweepers expressed a low level of infection-control knowledge and practice, while surgeons demonstrated the highest level.

Knowledge
Practices
Infection Control
Neurological Center
Patient Safety
Operating Theatre
Infection Prevention
Pakistan

Citation Metrics

Citation counts are retrieved automatically from independent scholarly databases. Counts are displayed separately because database coverage and citation matching differ.

Crossref

Citations reported through the Crossref scholarly metadata network.

Loading…
OpenAlex

Citations indexed by the OpenAlex scholarly knowledge graph.

Loading…
Semantic Scholar ↗

Citations indexed by the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph.

Loading…
Citation counts are intentionally not combined. The same citing publication may appear in multiple scholarly databases, and individual services differ in coverage, update frequency and matching. Citation data loading…

Citation Generator

Select a referencing style, copy the citation directly, or export this article for use with reference-management software.

Authors’ Contributions

Contributor Statement

Equal contributions.

Declarations

Conflict of Interest & Funding

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest.

Funding: No funding received by the authors.

Article History

Editorial Timeline

Received 14 July 2025
Accepted 9 November 2025
Available Online 16 November 2025
Open Access

Licence & Article Record

This article is published by The Operating Room Global Journal (TORGJ) under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).

Persistent DOI: 10.64573/torgj2507006

Scholarly Indexing

Semantic Scholar

This article has a Semantic Scholar record.

View on Semantic Scholar ↗

Access the Published Article

Read the official full-text publication, access the persistent DOI record, or return to Volume 1, Issue 1.