Anxiety and Depression Among Rural Population Due to Lockdowns During COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract
Study background, aims, methodology, principal findings, conclusion and key messages.
The COVID-19 pandemic has been unprecedented both in magnitude and in the fallout. While considerable attention has been given to the mental health of patients, less is known about the effects of mitigation strategies like lockdowns on the general population. We conducted a study in a rural set-up to evaluate anxiety and depression consequent upon the imposition of lockdowns during the epidemic.
To analyze the relation between COVID-19 lockdowns and anxiety and depression among the rural population.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted telephonically and online through e-forms. Two study tools, GAD-7 and PHQ-9, were used to objectively evaluate anxiety and depression, respectively, among the study participants. Data was collected by the snowball sampling technique and subjected to statistical analysis.
Adolescents, females, unmarried participants, students, those living in families with more than four members, and those hailing from plains were more likely to be depressed. Middle-aged participants, females, married participants, private employees, those living in families with more than four members, and those hailing from plains had higher anxiety levels.
COVID-19 mitigation strategies had significant effects on the mental health of the general population, even in rural areas, with some particular groups affected more than others.
Citation Metrics
Citation counts are retrieved automatically from independent scholarly databases and are displayed separately because database coverage and citation matching differ.
Citations reported through the Crossref scholarly metadata network.
Loading…Citations indexed by the OpenAlex scholarly knowledge graph.
Loading…Citation Generator
Select a referencing style, copy the citation directly, or export the article for use with a reference manager.
Contributor Statement
All the authors contributed to the conception of the study, study design, data acquisition, writing and formatting of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest & Funding
Conflict of Interest:
Aabid Ashraf serves on the Institutional
Review Board of The Operating Room Global (TORG).
Funding:
No funding received by the authors.
Ethical Approval & Consent
The published article describes this as an anonymized, non-institution-based descriptive study and states that due consent was taken from participants.
Data Sharing
Data can be shared with permission from the authors.
Editorial Timeline
Licence & Article Record
This article is published by
The Operating Room Global Journal (TORGJ)
under the Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).
Persistent DOI:
10.64573/torgj2509001
Semantic Scholar
This article has a Semantic Scholar record.
View on Semantic Scholar ↗
Access the Published Article
Read the official full-text publication, access the persistent DOI record, or return to Volume 1, Issue 1.