Scaling Laparoscopic Surgery in LMICs: Barriers, Innovations and Policy Recommendations
Abstract
Overview of the study background, objective, methodology, findings and conclusions.
Laparoscopic surgery has transformed surgical care by reducing morbidity, shortening hospital stays, and improving recovery. However, its adoption in low- and middle-income countries remains limited.
This article assesses the current landscape, challenges, and enablers of laparoscopic surgery in LMICs and provides policy and research recommendations for sustainable expansion.
A narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and institutional/grey literature sources for English-language records between January 2013 and March 2024. Search terms included (“laparoscopic surgery” OR “minimally invasive surgery” OR “MIS”) AND (“low- and middle-income” OR “LMIC” OR “developing country”) AND (“training” OR “cost” OR “barrier” OR “implementation”). Titles/abstracts and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. A total of 78 articles met the inclusion criteria. Themes were synthesized using an iterative thematic analysis.
Key barriers identified were limited infrastructure, inadequate training programmes, high equipment costs, cultural resistance, and weak financing mechanisms. Emerging initiatives involving locally manufactured or refurbished laparoscopic equipment in regions including Nigeria and India may help mitigate cost barriers. Promising enablers included low-cost laparoscopic kits, mobile simulation platforms, and NGO-supported programmes. Evidence gaps remain in cost-effectiveness research, comparative evaluation of training models, and assessment of policy interventions.
Scaling up laparoscopic surgery in LMICs is an urgent priority. Targeted investments, supportive policies, and cultural engagement are essential to overcome barriers. Closing knowledge gaps and embedding laparoscopic techniques into national surgical plans can help reduce disparities and strengthen surgical systems in resource-limited settings.
Citation Metrics
Citation counts are retrieved automatically from independent scholarly databases. Counts are displayed separately because coverage and citation matching differ between platforms.
Citations reported through the Crossref scholarly metadata network.
Loading…Citation count reported by the OpenAlex scholarly knowledge graph.
Loading…Citation Generator
Select a referencing style, copy the citation directly, or export the publication for use with a reference manager.
Contributor Statement
Oluwatobiloba O. Aweda conceptualized the study and led the writing process. Emmanuel A. Owolabi contributed to the literature review and drafting. Olorunwa B. Alalade participated in data synthesis and critical revisions. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest & Funding
Conflict of Interest:
No conflict of interest.
Funding:
No funding received by the authors.
Editorial Timeline
Licence & Article Record
This article is published by
The Operating Room Global Journal (TORGJ)
under the Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).
Persistent DOI:
10.64573/torgj2507007
Semantic Scholar
This article has a Semantic Scholar record.
View on Semantic Scholar ↗
Access the Published Article
Access the official TORGJ full-text PDF, persistent DOI record, or return to Volume 1, Issue 1.