Effect of Organizational and Environmental Stressors on Surgical Team Performance and Patient Safety in a Northwest Nigerian Tertiary Hospital: A Cross-sectional Study
Abstract
Study background, methodology, principal findings and conclusion.
Organizational and environmental stress has a significant impact on job performance and patient safety in high-demand healthcare settings such as the operating theatre. This study aimed to assess the effect of organizational and environmental stressors on surgical team members’ performance and patient safety in a Northwest Nigerian tertiary hospital.
A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study was conducted among 177 surgical healthcare professionals. Data were collected using the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Generic Job Stress adapted questionnaire and the Perceived Stress Scale. Descriptive statistics including mean and standard deviation, and inferential analyses including chi-square tests, t-test and regression were performed with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
The majority of surgical team members reported moderate stress (65.0%), while 20.3% reported severe stress. Organizational stressors ranked highest with an overall mean score of 4.038, followed by environmental stressors (3.981) and interpersonal factors (3.945). Common stress-related outcomes included musculoskeletal pain and fatigue (4.09 ± 0.79), poor job satisfaction (4.02 ± 0.78), and low motivation (4.01 ± 0.79).
No statistically significant associations were identified between stress levels and years of experience (β = −0.100, p = 0.254) or weekly call hours (β = 0.067, p = 0.385).
The findings indicate that organizational and environmental factors have a greater impact on team stress than demographic variables. Targeted interventions to improve workplace policies, environmental conditions, and support systems are important for reducing stress, enhancing team performance, and maintaining patient safety.
Citation Metrics
Citation counts are retrieved automatically from independent scholarly databases. Counts are displayed separately because database coverage and citation matching differ.
Citations reported through the Crossref scholarly metadata network.
Loading…Citations indexed by the OpenAlex scholarly knowledge graph.
Loading…Citation Generator
Select a referencing style, copy the citation, or export the article for use with a reference-management application.
Contributor Statement
Equal contributions.
Conflict of Interest & Funding
Conflict of Interest:
No conflict of interest.
Funding:
No funding received by the authors.
Ethical Approval
Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Committee of Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, reference ABUTH 954524802, dated 16 March 2020. Written informed consent was obtained from participants.
Secondary Cross-Sectional Analysis
The study used secondary data originally collected among surgical team members at Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, between 24 March and 15 April 2020. The final analysis included 177 eligible surgical healthcare professionals.
Editorial Timeline
Licence & Article Record
This article is published by
The Operating Room Global Journal (TORGJ)
under the Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0).
Persistent DOI:
10.64573/torgj2508002
Semantic Scholar
This article has a Semantic Scholar record.
View on Semantic Scholar ↗
Access the Published Article
Read the official full-text publication, access the persistent DOI record, or return to Volume 1, Issue 1.