Comparative Study on Sutures vs Staples for Skin Closure in a Patient Undergoing Thyroidectomy

The Operating Room Global Journal · Volume 2 · Issue 1
Original Research · Endocrine Surgery & Wound Closure

Comparative Study on Sutures vs Staples for Skin Closure in a Patient Undergoing Thyroidectomy

Authors

Saeed Ahmad1,2*; Summyya Musharaf1; Nimra Rafique1

1 University of Health Sciences (UHS), Lahore, Pakistan.

2 The Operating Room Global (TORG).

Corresponding Author Saeed Ahmad [email protected]

Abstract

A prospective observational comparison of sutures and staples for skin closure following thyroidectomy, examining postoperative pain, wound outcomes, patient comfort and cosmetic appearance.

Background

Thyroidectomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure, and the choice of skin closure technique can influence postoperative recovery, cosmetic outcomes and patient comfort. Sutures and staples are both widely used; however, their comparative effectiveness remains debated.

Objective

To compare postoperative outcomes of sutures versus staples for skin closure following thyroidectomy in terms of pain intensity, wound complications, patient comfort and cosmetic appearance.

Methodology

This prospective observational study was conducted at Shalamar Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 101 patients undergoing thyroidectomy were included. Patients were allocated according to the skin closure technique used: sutures (n=53) and staples (n=48). Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while wound outcomes were evaluated using the Modified Southampton Wound Scoring System. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25.

Results

Staples demonstrated better wound appearance and lower rates of inflammation and serous discharge compared with sutures. Patients in the staple group, however, experienced significantly higher postoperative pain scores (p=0.016). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding seroma formation, drain comfort or ICU stay.

Conclusion

Staples were associated with favourable wound outcomes but greater postoperative pain. The authors conclude that the selection of skin closure technique should be individualised according to patient needs and surgeon preference.

Study Design Prospective

Observational comparative study.

Total Sample 101

Patients undergoing thyroidectomy.

Suture Group n = 53

52.5% of study participants.

Staple Group n = 48

47.5% of study participants.

Postoperative Pain

Significant Difference Between Groups

Pain grade was significantly associated with closure technique (p=0.016), with severe and worst pain grades reported more frequently among patients receiving staples.

Seroma

No Significant Association

Seroma was present in 45.3% of the suture group and 39.6% of the staple group. The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.563).

Drain Comfort

No Significant Difference

There was no statistically significant association between closure technique and drain comfort (p=0.139).

ICU Requirement

No Significant Association

The need for ICU care did not differ significantly between the suture and staple treatment groups (p=0.295).

Wound Appearance

Appearance Grades Compared

The Modified Southampton Wound Scoring System was used to assess postoperative wound appearance. The reported association between appearance grade and treatment group was not statistically significant (p=0.131).

Gender Distribution

Comparable Treatment Allocation

The study included 52 females and 49 males. There was no statistically significant association between gender and treatment group (p=0.909).

Type of Thyroidectomy

Association With Treatment Group

The published results report a statistically significant association between the type of thyroidectomy performed and the closure treatment group.

Clinical Application

Individualised Closure Selection

The findings support considering postoperative pain, wound characteristics, patient needs and surgeon preference when selecting between sutures and staples.

Thyroidectomy
Sutures
Staples
Skin Closure
Wound Closure
Postoperative Pain
Cosmetic Outcomes
Endocrine Surgery
Surgical Wounds
Patient Outcomes

Citation Metrics

Citation counts are retrieved independently from scholarly databases. Counts are displayed separately because database coverage, citation matching and update frequency may differ.

Crossref —

Citations reported through the Crossref scholarly metadata network.

Loading…
OpenAlex —

Citations indexed within the OpenAlex scholarly knowledge graph.

Loading…
Semantic Scholar ↗ —

Citations indexed through the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph.

Loading…
Citation counts are intentionally not combined because the same citing publication may be indexed by more than one scholarly database. Citation data loading…

Citation Generator

Select a referencing style, copy the formatted citation, or export the article record for use with reference-management software.

Article Type

Original Research

Prospective observational comparative study examining postoperative outcomes associated with two skin closure techniques following thyroidectomy.

Study Design

Prospective Observational Study

Patients were allocated to suture or staple closure according to surgeon preference rather than random assignment.

Study Setting

Shalamar Hospital, Lahore

The study was conducted in the Ear, Nose and Throat Department of Surgery at Shalamar Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.

Study Duration

Six Months

The study was completed over a six-month period following approval of the research synopsis.

Study Population

101 Thyroidectomy Patients

The study included 101 patients undergoing thyroidectomy: 53 received suture closure and 48 received staple closure. The sample included 49 males and 52 females.

Sampling

Non-Probability Purposive Sampling

The published methodology reports use of a non-probability purposive sampling technique.

Eligibility

Adults Undergoing Thyroid Surgery

Eligible participants had confirmed thyroid disease requiring thyroidectomy and were aged 18 to 65 years. The stated indications included thyroid cancer, multinodular goitre and hyperthyroidism.

Exclusion Criteria

Specified Clinical Exclusions

Patients with previous open neck wound surgery, diabetes with ongoing skin or other infection, and pregnant patients were excluded.

Comparison Groups

Sutures vs Staples

Group A comprised patients receiving suture closure after thyroidectomy, while Group B comprised patients receiving staple closure.

Pain Assessment

Visual Analog Scale

Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10.

Wound Assessment

Modified Southampton Score

Postoperative wound outcomes were assessed using the Modified Southampton Wound Scoring System alongside physical examination for seroma, haematoma and other postoperative wound characteristics.

Statistical Analysis

SPSS Version 25

Numerical variables were reported using mean and standard deviation, while qualitative variables were reported using frequencies and percentages. Chi-square testing was used to assess associations between categorical variables, with p≤0.05 treated as statistically significant.

Ethical Approval

SSAHS-IRB

The published methodology reports institutional ethical approval under reference: SIHS/IRB/2023/017. Written consent was obtained from participating patients.

Primary Pain Finding

p = 0.016

The study reported a statistically significant association between closure technique and postoperative pain grade, with severe or worst pain categories occurring more frequently in the staple group.

Seroma Outcome

p = 0.563

No statistically significant association was identified between closure technique and postoperative seroma.

Drain Comfort

p = 0.139

No statistically significant association was reported between closure technique and drain comfort.

ICU Requirement

p = 0.295

No statistically significant association was reported between treatment group and need for ICU care.

Wound Appearance

p = 0.131

The detailed results reported no statistically significant association between treatment group and wound appearance grade.

Authors’ Contribution

Equal Contributions

The published article records equal contributions among the authors.

Declarations

Conflict of Interest & Funding

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest.

Funding: No funding received by the authors.

Article History

Editorial Timeline

Received 27 January 2026
Accepted 2 February 2026
Available Online 4 February 2026
Open Access

CC BY 4.0

This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence.

DOI: 10.64573/torgj2601004

Journal Record

Volume 2 · Issue 1 · 2026

The Operating Room Global Journal (TORGJ).
ISSN 3105-3262.
Original Research.
Article DOI: 10.64573/torgj2601004.

Scholarly Indexing

Semantic Scholar

This article has a Semantic Scholar record.

View on Semantic Scholar ↗

Access the Published Article

Read the official full-text article, access the persistent DOI record, or browse Volume 2, Issue 1.